Evenly split between left and
right-leaning parties, old and young, career politicians and academics,
Hungary’s 24 newly-elected MEP’s will be in the thick of action. They
will muster their professional experiences in local Hungarian politics
and examine just
how to put their expertise into play in Europe’s super-parliament.
Many of the newly elected representatives recently left day-to-day
national politics, and will have to learn the ins and outs of the EP
very fast if they want to be on equal footing with more experienced
EP members. Each, however, hopes to reach the principal EP goal: how
to best serve national interests. Even former observers will have to
broaden their knowledge of how the EU works.
“The rules of the Parliament change as its powers evolve, so there
is always something new to learn,” said socialist MEP Alexandra Dobolyi,
who worked in Brussels, and was secretary of the Foreign Policy Committee
of Hungarian Socialist Party (HSP).
For those who made the most of their time as a former EP observer,
the fruits of their labor will reap rewards in the first days of the
five-year EP term. Three active observers in the Hungarian delegation,
József Szájer from center-right Fidesz–Hungarian Civic Union list, HSP
representative Magda Kósa-Kovács and Alliance of Free Democrat (AFD)
MEP István Szent-Iványi, are already benefiting from having made contacts
in recent months.
Labor rules
Kósa-Kovács, for her part, says she will try to resolve disparities
between Hungarian and EU labor rules, making politicians in her party-group
see that Hungary does have a strict labor-protection system in place.
She will also prioritize anti-discrimination strategies. Kósa-Kovács’s
role in the EP will also have more weight as she was elected vice president
of the European Socialists’ Party.
Hungarian conservatives have also shown good standing within the European
People’s Party and European Democrats (EPP-ED), the largest parliamentary
group, by the fact the party’s July Europe-wide strategy meeting was
held in Budapest.
Strong positions within their parties is a must for the ambitious,
but relatively few Hungarian MEPs underline the need for cooperation
among the whole “team.” As young socialist MEP Alexandra Dobolyi explains
it, the plenary does what the committees suggest, while the stance of
committees on any given issue is negotiated between different party
groupings, which usually vote as agreed in party work-groups. In most
cases this means Hungarian MEPs can exert the most influence on proceedings
if they convince other members in work-groups. Szájer has also been
elected vice-president of his party, and as such he also hopes to use
this influence to further Hungarian interests, having gained experience
in lobbying in the run-up to the creation of a European Convention..
Agriculture, a sour point
One lobbying issue shared by both socialist and conservative MEPs from
Hungary is that farmers in new member states should receive the same
amount in EU subsidies as EU-15 farmers. Accession negotiations were
closed with an agreement that new members would get only 25 percent
of subsidies available to older members. While subsidies are set to
be gradually raised, the issue has the potential to create unrest among
the agricultural sector in new EU members.
“I don’t have many illusions,” says socialist agricultural specialist
and delegation leader Csaba Tabajdi, “but I think that even shortening
the phasing-in period by a few years would be a success.”
Another issue of national interest amongst Hungarian MEPs is making
use of Hungary’s geographically central position in Europe. That is,
making sure as many EU transportation corridors pass through Hungary,
thereby assuring EU funds for the building of local motorways.
“This is not a question of left or right,” says socialist MEP Zita
Gurmai, who made the issue one of her priority projects during her
stay as a Brussels observer. Hungarian MEPs are also planning to make
use of the fact that many Hungarian problems and interests are shared
by other new members.
Regional environmental challenges
“We have many environmental problems in common that the older members
do not share,” says conservative MEP Péter Olajos, who represents the
Hungarian Democratic Forum (HDF), and considers his principal goal the
creation of an environmental protection fund that focuses on new members.
“Taking care of environmental damage done, and left untreated by the
Soviet troops, would take about 40 years if we were left on our own
with this problem,” he points out.
Olajos has a strategy of how to achieve this goal. Firstly, he intends
to address the Visegrad countries to achieve support and consensus on
the issue, and will then spread his efforts to MEPs of countries with
similar, but not identical problems, such as Germany and Denmark, he
explains.
“I don’t think I will see any result before 2006, though,” he adds.
The fact Olajos that has a concrete goal and a plan is a rare commodity
amongst Hungarian MEPs. Most are waiting to see what committee and subcommittee
positions they get before committing themselves to any particular project.
Wish-lists drawn up by the delegation are likely to undergo numerous
changes as party group and interparty negotiations progress.
Both socialist and conservative Hungarian delegations have declared
they would like to cover as many positions as possible. The danger is,
as past experience has shown, MEPs should consult with each other before
compiling such wish-lists to ensure the best possible mix in different
professional committees. Such strategizing on a national level, however,
has yet to take place among the Hungarians, sources say.
One downside to the Hungarian delegation is a lack of expertise on
economic questions, considered to be among the most significant dimension
of the EU for most Hungarians. Two rare examples, however, are Socialist
MEP Szabolcs Fazakas, a former economic minister and head of Daimler
Chrysler Central Europe, and infrastructurespecialist conservative Etelka
Barsi-Pataky.
Specialized fields
Many members of the Hungarian delegation are actually specialized in
fields on the margins of daily Hungarian politics, including minority
or women’s issues, developing countries or sports and youth issues.
Conservative MEP Lívia Járóka, for example, is the sole Roma representative
in the EP, much to even her astonishment.
"My job is to be the voice of the gypsies in Europe and to make
politicians see the world from the point of view of the Roma who are
marginalized across Europe," she told French news agency AFP. A
former radio announcer on Radio C, which runs gypsy programming in Hungary,
Jaroka is currently finishing her doctoral thesis in anthropology at
the University College of London on gypsy identity in the Roma-dominated
eighth district of Budapest. But even though ethnic discrimination is
a serious problem in Hungary, where 5 percent of the population is Roma,
many minority-specialized MEPs from Hungary have focused on Hungarian
minorities in neighboring countries, opposed to problems facing minorities
within Hungary.
Alexandra Dobolyi, who specializes in aid to developing countries,
will likely be the sole Hungarian MEP in the Development and Cooperation
Committee. While the issue of developing countries may be one of two
important aspects of EU foreign policy, Hungary does not have an active
history in developing close ties to many developing countries, with
fast-moving China and Vietnam the notable exceptions to the rule. “As
a member of Socialists International, I have met many politicians from
third-world countries, and would like to work to help the development
of their countries in the EP, while my knowledge of them will help me
work in the Foreign Affairs or Development Committees,” Dobolyi says.
She cites the work of the Hungarian-based international development
agency Tesco as an example to be followed, adding that the organization
has already helped plan EUfunded projects in Vietnam.
“It is impossible to upgrade developing economies in one go, so it
is very important to grab one problem, be it water-shortage, the lack
of roads or drainpipes, and try and solve that,” she says, although
she does not yet have a list of concrete projects to be done. Looking
at the particular mix of skills Hungarian MEPs bring to the EP, it is
obvious some will end up in committees dealing with topics they are
not experienced in. And the relatively small number of economy-oriented
Hungarian MEPs may mean that many committees will not get expert Hungarian
MEPs in particular topics. In any event, EP members attain some knowledge
on committee topics during the course of work. “Even if MEPs are not
initially the established experts of their committees, they can learn,”
says Dobolyi. - with reporting by Kósa András.
|